October 3, 2008 Standards, open standards and double standardsIn my last post I took Big Blue to task for its announcement that it intends to wage war against Microsoft in the world’s standards bodies. The motivation for this bellicose declaration was IBM’s stinging defeat last Spring in its battle to prevent the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) from ratifying Microsoft’s de facto office document standard (OOXML). IBM charges that Microsoft won at the ISO only because it packed the national standards organizations that make up the ISO membership with its pals. But the thing that galls me about IBM’s position – and the reason I wrote my post – is not its goody-two-shoes stance about lobbying. No, it’s the flagrant hypocrisy behind this whole open standards campaign. In a nutshell, Big Blue conspicuously fails to practice what it preaches. Click to read more...
More articles by Jeff Gould, CEO & Director of Research, Peerstone Research |
SPONSORED |


Want to host a Solution Center on Interop News?
For more information, Click Here.
March 27, 2008 By Matt Asay (CNET News)
The most critical element that emerged from Brad Smith's OSBC keynote is the importance of protecting the downstream. By "downstream" I mean those users who may come into contact with open-source software beyond the immediate licensee. One of the benefits of open source is that once released under a certain license, the code endures under that license.
Reader Comments